Bridging the Safeguarding Gap in the U.S. Nonprofit Sector

Open-access frameworks equipping U.S. nonprofits to operationalize their duty of care.

Safeguarding is an organization’s duty to make sure the people it serves are never harmed by its own staff, volunteers, or anyone acting in its name. The United Nations and international aid agencies spent two decades putting this into practice through a complete safeguarding standard. In the United States, this protection is scattered across separate laws, each covering a single setting or group: residents of nursing homes, children in schools, employees in the workplace. In the absence of a unified standard, organizations are expected to fill the space themselves. But the absence of a standard is not an absence of risk: harm is possible in any organization, and when it occurs, everything the organization has built — its funding, its reputation, its mission — is on the line.

This initiative compared the international standard with U.S. law and mapped exactly where the fragments end and the gaps begin. The result is a set of open-access tools — a policy template, a self-assessment, and training materials — built to fill those gaps and free for any organization to adopt.

The crosswalk at a glance Chart of 13 international safeguarding obligations. None is anchored by a U.S. requirement of general application that reaches nonprofits and protects the people they serve. Eleven are anchored only for a bounded group, such as licensed long-term care. Two, exchanging aid already owed and reporting across organizations, have no anchor identified within the scope of the review. Bounded group — 11 of 13 No anchor identified — 2 of 13 0 General application — 0 of 13 PRINCIPLE 1 1.1 Abuse classed as gross misconduct 1.2 Dismissal that follows the person PRINCIPLE 2 2.1 No sexual activity with under-18s 2.2 Mistaken age is no defence PRINCIPLE 3 3.1 No exchanging money, goods or services for sex 3.2 No exchanging aid already owed PRINCIPLE 4 4.1 No sexual relationships with participants PRINCIPLE 5 5.1 Duty to report a colleague 5.2 Reporting across organizations 5.3 An organizational reporting mechanism PRINCIPLE 6 6.1 A preventive environment 6.2 Promoting a code of conduct 6.3 Leadership responsible for systems

0 of 13 anchored for the whole sector · 11 of 13 anchored only for a bounded group · 2 of 13 with no anchor identified

Figure 1 — The crosswalk at a glance. Each row is one obligation of the international safeguarding standard, mapped against U.S. federal and state law. Source: Gul (2026), Safeguarding Without a Baseline, Module 1, §7.1 and Appendix A.

Published outputs

Module 1 — Safeguarding Without a Baseline The 13-element crosswalk of the international standard against U.S. law. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22022939
Implementation Toolkit v1.1 Four free tools for building a safeguarding system. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23002214
Washington Safeguarding Baseline 2026 A random-sample study of 100 direct-service nonprofits. Read the study

Updates